Degree-Equivalence Assessments
Date of Information: 10/26/2026
Check back soon; we update these materials frequently.
Employment-Based Immigration / The I-140 Process / Advanced Degree or Exceptional Ability
Understand what your foreign education establishes
A well-supported evaluation connects your academic records to the U.S. educational system. Start with the question your immigration case needs to answer, then choose a qualified evaluator and the right report.
Confirm the relevant immigration category, degree level, field, and supporting records with your attorney.
Select an evaluator with relevant expertise, transparent terms, and a defensible methodology.
The evaluation supports the evidence. USCIS retains the decision on equivalency and eligibility.
How important is an evaluation to your case?
A degree-equivalence assessment explains how education earned outside the United States compares with U.S. education. Its importance depends on what your petition needs to prove. If eligibility depends on a foreign degree meeting a U.S. degree requirement, proving that equivalence is essential. A credible evaluation can be a central part of that proof. If you already qualify through a relevant U.S. degree or a route that does not require degree equivalence, a separate foreign-degree report may add little.
Who does what?
Credential evaluation service: a private business or nonprofit organization that reviews foreign academic records and prepares an expert opinion. In this guide, “evaluator” means the professional who performs that analysis.
NACES and AICE: nongovernmental professional associations that set standards and review member organizations. Their member evaluation services prepare the reports.
USCIS: the U.S. government agency that decides the immigration petition. It considers the report alongside the academic records and other evidence, and makes its own determination.
An evaluation does not award a new degree, grant a professional license, or approve an immigration benefit. Its value is a documented explanation of your education. USCIS describes educational evaluations as advisory opinions.
H-1B: establishing that you qualify for the specialty occupation
If you rely on a foreign degree, establish its U.S. equivalence and fit with the specialty occupation. A supported evaluation can be important evidence; a diploma and translation alone may not answer those questions.
The rules recognize academic evaluations by reliable foreign-credential services. Crediting experience or training toward education requires a different regulatory basis: for example, an official authorized to grant such credit at an accredited institution with an appropriate program, or USCIS's experience-equivalency determination. A professor's title or doctorate alone does not establish that credit-granting authority.
A qualifying U.S. degree ordinarily needs no foreign-degree comparison for that credential. A report also cannot establish that the job itself qualifies or satisfy every other H-1B requirement. See 8 CFR 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(C)–(D).
EB-2 NIW: separate the EB-2 qualification from the waiver
An NIW petition presents two separate questions: Do you qualify for EB-2? And does your case justify waiving the job-offer and labor-certification requirements? A degree evaluation primarily addresses the first question when you rely on foreign education.
Foreign advanced-degree route: the record must establish the foreign degree's equivalence to the relevant U.S. advanced degree. A reasoned evaluation can be especially important where the degree's level, institution, duration, or structure is unfamiliar or disputed.
Bachelor's-plus-five-years route: you still need a qualifying U.S. bachelor's degree or foreign equivalent, followed by at least five years of progressive post-degree experience in the specialty. An evaluation can address the foreign degree; employer letters separately document the qualifying experience. The immigration rule does not award you a master's degree.
U.S. advanced-degree route: a foreign-degree report is not automatically necessary merely because you also studied abroad, if the U.S. credential and other evidence establish the relevant qualification.
Exceptional-ability route: a U.S.-equivalent advanced degree is not a universal requirement. Educational evidence may support one criterion, but the case must satisfy the applicable evidentiary and overall exceptional-ability standards.
A favorable academic evaluation does not establish the proposed endeavor's substantial merit or national importance, show that you are well positioned to advance it, or establish the NIW balance. Read USCIS's EB-2 and NIW guidance.
What if no evaluation accompanies the I-140?
The absence of a privately prepared report does not, by itself, mean that every I-140 must be denied. USCIS examines whether the required qualifications are established by the evidence as a whole. In a case that depends on foreign-degree equivalence, however, omitting a persuasive explanation can leave an essential eligibility question unresolved. USCIS may request more evidence or deny a petition that does not establish eligibility. An opportunity to supplement the record is not guaranteed. See the evidence rules in 8 CFR 103.2(b)(8).
We cannot give a reliable percentage for how much an evaluation changes approval odds. That would require comparable case data accounting for the educational record, eligibility route, report quality, and other evidence. The practical question is whether omitting the report leaves a material issue unproved. If your case relies on a foreign degree, plan for a suitable evaluation early unless your attorney identifies an adequate alternative evidentiary basis.
Other I-140 categories
EB-3 professional cases require a U.S. bachelor's degree or foreign equivalent; skilled-worker cases follow different qualification rules. For employer-sponsored cases, counsel must also address the certified job requirements and relevant dates. EB-1A has no general minimum-degree requirement, so an evaluation serves a supporting role only when educational equivalence matters to the particular evidence.
This guide sits beneath Building a Case for Exceptional Ability or an Advanced Degree and supports the broader I-140 process at Charles International Law.
How to obtain the right evaluation
Start with the legal question. Ask your attorney which degree, level, field, and filing category the report needs to address. Tell us about earlier evaluations, incomplete programs, transferred credits, distance study, name changes, and unusual degree structures.
Choose the report before paying. A general or document-by-document report usually addresses the credential's U.S. educational equivalent. A course-by-course report adds individual courses, credits, grades, and often a GPA. More detail is useful when the case requires it, but the most expensive report is not automatically the right one. An H-1B education-and-experience opinion or a Canadian immigration ECA is not automatically suitable for an I-140 case.
Confirm the evaluator's country-specific requirements. Common records include the diploma or degree certificate, complete transcripts or mark sheets, prior qualifying education, and records of transfers or program completion. The credential evaluation service may require records sent directly by the school, sealed records, verified electronic delivery, originals, or specified copies. Do not mail irreplaceable originals until the requirement and return arrangements are clear.
Arrange translations and verification. Ask whether the evaluator provides translations, accepts your translations, or offers a translation waiver only for its internal use. A waiver does not supply the translations needed for the immigration filing.
Apply through the provider's official channel. State that the report is intended for U.S. employment-based immigration. Confirm the full price, recipient, delivery format, document-return policy, and when the turnaround clock begins.
Have counsel review the completed report. Check names, awarding institution, degree title, dates, field, records reviewed, evaluator qualifications, methodology, and the precise equivalency conclusion. Request correction of factual errors or an explanation of unsupported conclusions before filing.
The report does not replace the underlying records
Keep the evaluation, diplomas, transcripts, verification correspondence, and required translations together. USCIS requires a full English translation of a foreign-language document, with the translator's certification that it is complete and accurate and that the translator is competent to translate. An evaluation summary is not a translation of the diploma or transcript. See 8 CFR 103.2(b)(3).
Timing depends on complete records, verification, and any further research. Rush processing can accelerate the evaluator's work; it cannot guarantee that an overseas institution will respond on time. For an example of country-specific document rules, see IERF's documentation requirements.
Which report is usually the right starting point?
| Application or eligibility route | Usual starting point | When to ask for more or different analysis |
|---|---|---|
| H-1B relying on a foreign degree | General / document-by-document academic evaluation addressing U.S. degree level and field. | Course-by-course detail when particular courses or credits are needed to explain the degree’s connection to the specialty. |
| H-1B relying on education plus training or experience | A tailored equivalency analysis supported through the applicable H-1B regulatory route; an ordinary academic report alone may not address it. | Counsel verifies the expert’s authority and the evidence of experience, training, and expertise. Adding a GPA does not solve that issue. |
| EB-2 advanced degree, including NIW, relying on a foreign master’s or higher degree | General / document-by-document report explaining the U.S. advanced-degree equivalence. | Additional academic analysis or course detail if the credential’s level, structure, recognition, or field needs clarification. |
| EB-2 advanced degree, including NIW, relying on a bachelor’s plus five years | General / document-by-document report on the foreign bachelor’s degree, plus separate qualifying-experience evidence. | More detail if the bachelor’s equivalence is disputed. A course-by-course report does not replace employer letters proving the experience. |
| EB-3 professional relying on a foreign bachelor’s degree | General / document-by-document report explaining bachelor’s-degree equivalence and field. | Course detail if the certified job requires particular coursework, or further analysis if equivalence is unclear. |
| EB-2 exceptional ability, EB-1A, or EB-3 skilled-worker route | No automatic report choice. Obtain an evaluation only when the educational evidence or job requirements call for it. | Counsel identifies what the particular case must prove. These routes do not all impose the same degree requirement. |
| H-1B or EB-2 case supported by an independently qualifying U.S. degree | Usually no foreign-degree evaluation for that U.S. credential. | Evaluate earlier foreign education only if it matters to another required qualification or an evidentiary issue. |
| Professional licensing or university admission—separate from the immigration petition | Often course-by-course or a profession-specific report, as the receiving institution or licensing board requires. | Confirm the recipient’s exact report and provider requirements. Its choice may differ from the immigration petition’s needs. |
Your attorney will advise you on the appropriate report. These are general starting points. Your particular case may justify a more detailed report, a less detailed report, a different type of expert analysis, or no evaluation. The applicable legal requirements, academic records, job requirements, and any receiving institution’s rules control. Confirm the scope with your attorney before paying.
These practical recommendations apply the report functions described by ECE and IERF to the distinctions in the H-1B rules and USCIS’s EB-2 guidance. A provider’s product name alone does not establish that its report meets your case’s needs.
What actually qualifies a credential evaluator?
The qualification is demonstrated expertise in comparative education, supported by training, supervised experience, reliable reference materials, and a defensible report—not a government appointment. A service's for-profit or nonprofit status does not by itself establish its competence. USCIS has not delegated the immigration decision to these organizations.
The U.S. Department of Education explains that it does not evaluate foreign qualifications or endorse particular evaluation services or associations. There is no federal credential-evaluator license that makes a report binding on USCIS. That does not eliminate ordinary business, privacy, or consumer-protection responsibilities. Department of Education guidance.
The individual evaluator's credentials: NACES's example
NACES's published standards require evaluators employed by members to have education comparable to at least a U.S. bachelor's degree, training or supervision by fully trained senior staff, and knowledge of both the foreign educational system and the U.S. system used for comparison. They must understand evaluation methods, reference resources, and procedures for identifying questionable records, and participate in continuing professional development.
A NACES member must have at least one full-time senior evaluator with at least five consecutive years of substantive, supervised credential-evaluation experience. Its standards call for a substantial reference library and public availability, on request, of senior evaluation staff qualifications and evaluation policies. These requirements explain what professional competence looks like; they are association standards, not a federal license. Read NACES's professional standards.
How an organization is vetted: AICE's example
AICE Endorsed Membership requires review of senior evaluator qualifications, sample evaluations, and a site visit. AICE describes a minimum of five years of full-time experience for qualified senior evaluators, along with reference resources, professional contributions, ethical standards, and annual recertification. Its detailed application requirements also address authenticity controls, translation resources, privacy policies, and professional references. AICE's explanation · Endorsed Membership requirements.
Check current NACES membership or current AICE Endorsed Membership directly. AICE Affiliate Membership is a different category. Membership is useful evidence of professional standing; it is not an immigration approval, an exclusive government-approved list, or a guarantee that an individual report is persuasive.
Why USCIS can consider their opinions
The evaluator supplies specialized educational analysis that may help USCIS interpret the record. For immigrant petitions, USCIS's Policy Manual permits consideration of credible independent evaluations and comparable evaluations by authorized school officials acting in their institutional capacity. It emphasizes a logical explanation grounded in the credentials and supporting resources. USCIS can give a conclusory or unsupported report little weight. Read the governing USCIS guidance.
Ask who will prepare or supervise your report, what relevant country expertise that person has, and whether their qualifications and analysis can be supplied to counsel. A credential evaluator need not be an immigration attorney, and an immigration attorney's legal qualification does not by itself establish expertise in foreign educational systems. For H-1B training-and-experience opinions, verify the additional authority required by the particular regulatory route.
School recognition is a different question
The standing of the school and program that awarded your credential is separate from the evaluation service's competence. An evaluator researches the institution's recognition and educational context; a recognized school does not automatically make every award equivalent to a U.S. degree.
How an evaluator reaches an equivalency: IERF's example
IERF's published approach considers entrance requirements, educational level, program content and purpose, duration, institutional status, the rights attached to the credential in its home system, and practical or clinical components. It states that its reports reflect the judgment of at least two qualified evaluators. This is a contextual comparison, rather than simply translating a title or counting years, and is not a universal USCIS scoring formula. Read IERF's methodology explanation.
Choosing a reputable evaluator
What to look for
Relevant expertise: ask about experience with your country, institution type, degree structure, and U.S. immigration reports. Confirm who is responsible for the analysis and how their qualifications can be established.
A reasoned report: request an anonymized sample or description showing the records examined, institutional recognition, educational framework, reference sources, and basis of the U.S. comparison.
Verifiable professional standing: check current NACES membership or AICE Endorsed Membership directly where claimed. Membership is useful evidence of standards, not the only possible basis for competence.
Document integrity: look for clear country-specific requirements and sensible procedures for checking authenticity and resolving discrepancies.
Transparent terms: obtain an itemized total, realistic processing conditions, refund and cancellation rules, privacy policy, and a correction or reconsideration procedure.
Usable delivery: confirm how you and your attorney will receive the complete report and any supporting materials needed for filing or an RFE response.
Independence: a reputable evaluator explains the evidence even when the conclusion is less favorable than you hoped.
Red flags
Promises of “guaranteed USCIS approval” or a guaranteed degree level before reviewing the records.
Claims of government accreditation or USCIS endorsement that cannot be verified through official sources.
Offering to change dates, invent credits, omit adverse records, or turn an incomplete program into an awarded degree.
Automatically applying an experience-for-education formula without checking the immigration category's rules.
A conclusory letter that does not identify the records, qualifications, or reasoning supporting the result.
Pressure to pay immediately, undisclosed add-on fees, unverifiable membership logos, or payment instructions that do not match the provider's official contact details.
No clear process for correcting errors, returning originals, or protecting your academic and identity records.
Different opinions are not automatically misconduct. Evaluators can reasonably disagree. If reports conflict, bring every report to your attorney so we can examine the factual and methodological differences. Do not conceal an unfavorable report or order repeated opinions simply to obtain a preferred label.
Before you pay: agree on the question
Ask us to confirm: Which qualification must this report establish, for which immigration category, and using which academic records? Then obtain the evaluator's written scope, document requirements, full quote, and delivery terms.
Important distinction: for EB-2 advanced-degree and EB-3 professional cases, a required foreign equivalent degree cannot simply be replaced by a combination of lesser credentials and work experience. The EB-2 bachelor's-plus-five-years route still requires a qualifying bachelor's degree. H-1B equivalency rules are different. Unusual or shorter programs, postgraduate diplomas, and combined qualifications require individual legal and academic analysis; do not assume a degree's title resolves the issue.
A report can explain what your education represents. Our attorneys determine how that opinion fits the category, the proposed endeavor or job requirements, the relevant dates, and the rest of your evidence.
Existing clients should contact their legal team before ordering. New clients can begin with the Immigration & Consular Issue Consultation.
Providers, published prices, and official resources
The following are examples to investigate, not a ranking or a guarantee that a particular evaluation service or report is suitable for your case. Four appear in the current NACES directory; ACEI appears in AICE's Endorsed Member directory. Confirm membership, report scope, country coverage, and your attorney's requirements before ordering.
Published fee examples checked October 26, 2026
Educational Credential Evaluators (ECE) — NACES member. Published General report: $110; Course by Course: $199. ECE identifies its General report as commonly suitable for immigration, subject to the recipient's requirements. Report options and fees.
International Education Research Foundation (IERF) — NACES member. Its employer/attorney fee schedule lists a General report at $100 and a Detail report at $195. Confirm the applicable ordering channel and price. Employer/attorney services and fees.
The Evaluation Company (TEC, formerly SpanTran) — NACES member. Published General Analysis: $95 with standard 10-business-day service; Course Analysis: $190. Confirm that the selected product addresses your immigration case. Current pricing.
Foundation for International Services (FIS) — NACES member. Its document-by-document evaluation starts at $110 for two-week service; the listed faster service options cost more. Report details and pricing.
Academic Credentials Evaluation Institute (ACEI) — AICE Endorsed Member. Offers a Basic document-by-document report for purposes including immigration. Request a quote based on your education and report needs; check separate delivery charges. Basic report scope · Current fees.
Budget for the complete order
The general-report examples above start around $95–$110; the listed course-by-course examples are $190–$199. These are selected published examples, not a market-wide price range or a quote. Verification, translations, additional credentials, rush service, delivery, duplicate reports, revisions, or a separate expert opinion may increase the total. Fees and turnaround times can change. Processing estimates usually depend on receipt and acceptance of all required materials; confirm this with the provider.
Directories and legal references
NACES current member directory and AICE Endorsed Member directory.
USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part E, Chapter 9: Evaluation of Education Credentials.
USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 5: Advanced Degree or Exceptional Ability.
USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 7: Skilled Worker, Professional, or Other Worker.
8 CFR 204.5: employment-based immigrant classification requirements.
U.S. Department of Education: recognition of foreign qualifications.
This guide provides general educational information. Your legal team will assess the educational evidence and current requirements for your particular case.
Common questions about foreign degree evaluations
Does USCIS approve particular evaluation companies?
A company's statement that it prepares reports for USCIS is not proof of government endorsement. USCIS evaluates the credibility of the report and retains the final decision. Check professional standing and the substance of the analysis.
Do I always need a course-by-course report?
No. A general report may address the necessary degree-level comparison. A detailed report may be appropriate when courses, credits, or a disputed educational issue matter. Ask counsel before ordering.
Does a favorable evaluation prove that I qualify for NIW?
No. It may help establish the educational part of underlying EB-2 eligibility. NIW requires a separate showing about the proposed endeavor, your positioning to advance it, and the benefit of waiving the job-offer and labor-certification requirements.
Can I use an evaluation prepared for a university, employer, or another country?
Possibly, but have counsel review its scope, supporting records, reasoning, and relevance. A report prepared for Canadian immigration or university admission does not automatically answer the U.S. immigrant-petition question.
What if my school has closed or records are difficult to obtain?
Tell the evaluator and your attorney before paying. Ask about recognized archives, successor institutions, official verification channels, and acceptable alternative evidence. Do not submit reconstructed records as though they were originals.
Does an evaluation authorize me to practice medicine, nursing, engineering, or another licensed profession?
No. Professional licensure and any occupation-specific immigration certification are separate requirements. Confirm the appropriate licensing board's rules and discuss any additional immigration requirements with counsel.
What if the evaluator concludes that my degree is not equivalent?
Review the facts and reasoning with counsel. Seek correction of errors through the evaluation service's review process, and assess other evidence or a different legal route where appropriate. A more favorable label cannot substitute for a defensible analysis.
Is an evaluation mandatory in every case?
No single rule makes a private foreign-degree report necessary for every H-1B or I-140 petition. The petitioner must establish the qualifications required by the specific classification and follow the applicable filing instructions. A case relying on a foreign degree needs adequate evidence of its U.S. equivalence; counsel should determine the appropriate report and supporting record.
Can USCIS deny the petition without first asking for an evaluation?
USCIS can deny a petition that does not establish eligibility, and an RFE is not guaranteed. If degree equivalence is essential to the case, resolve that evidentiary issue before filing rather than relying on a later chance to supply a report.