Policy Analysis at Charles International Law
Introduction
The law is not static. From the founding of the United States, it has been understood that laws must adapt to meet the needs of the people. Legislatures pass new statutes, executive leaders promulgate new rules, and the courts interpret them in light of changing realities.
At Charles International Law, our mission is not confined to applying the law as it exists today—we are equally committed to ensuring that the law evolves in ways that best serve our clients in the future. Rooted in the experience of our founder, Nathan M. F. Charles—a former federal prosecutor, national security official, and combat-tested U.S. Navy SEAL officer—our firm is guided by a steadfast commitment to preserving the constitutional republic and defending the Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and domestic. That commitment extends beyond the courtroom: we devote a portion of our time and resources to policy analysis, public advocacy, and thought leadership.
This page highlights some of our most prominent policy initiatives and publications. Through them, we seek to inform public debate, influence lawmakers, and ensure that the law continues to meet the urgent needs of those we serve.
Policy Blog
Please enjoy this policy analysis by our founder and managing partner, Nathan M. F. Charles, Esq.
Social Media and Podcasts
Please enjoy our other commentary and policy analysis on our social media platforms and our podcast.
Socials
Podcast Platforms
Join the Conversation
At Charles International Law, we believe the law is not static—it evolves through dialogue, debate, and the lived experiences of the people it serves. That’s why we’ve added this discussion space powered by Disqus. We invite you to share your thoughts on our policy initiatives, comment on our analyses, and even challenge our positions. Healthy criticism and diverse viewpoints are not only welcome, but vital to ensuring our advocacy reflects the realities and needs of those we serve.
This is more than a comment box—it’s an opportunity to shape the conversation around immigration, asylum, human rights, and national security law. Whether you agree with us, disagree with us, or want to propose a new perspective, your voice matters. We encourage you to join in with candor, respect, and a shared commitment to strengthening the rule of law. Respectful discourse is not just a courtesy—it is part of the very fabric of democratic governance and legal integrity. By keeping the focus on ideas rather than individuals, we can together foster a space where better arguments lead to better policy.
Community Guidelines for Moderation
To keep this forum constructive and respectful, we will moderate comments according to the following standards:
Respect others. Critique ideas, not people. Personal attacks, threats, harassment, or abusive language directed at our clients, our team, or other users will not be tolerated. At Charles International Law, we always aim for excellence in our advocacy. As such, we do not engage in what are known as ad hominem attacks. An ad hominem is an attack on the person delivering an argument rather than on the ideas themselves—a logical fallacy so well established it is literally named in Latin. Much in the same way that we will not tolerate those fallacies in our own rhetoric and advocacy, we will not tolerate them here. This is a place to challenge arguments and ideas, not people.
Stay on topic. Comments should relate to law, policy, and advocacy. Off-topic promotions, spam, or irrelevant content may be removed.
No hate speech. Discrimination, defamation, or derogatory remarks targeting any group or individual based on race, religion, gender, orientation, or other protected characteristics are prohibited.
Constructive dialogue encouraged. Differences of opinion are welcome, but comments must contribute to thoughtful discussion rather than disruption.
Confidentiality matters. Do not post private client details, personal information, or case-sensitive material in this space.
Moderation decisions will be made at the discretion of Charles International Law to ensure this space remains a safe and valuable platform for all. Persistent violators may be blocked from further participation.
Frequently Asked Questions About Charles International Law’s Policy Advocacy
1. What does “policy advocacy” mean at Charles International Law?
We engage with laws, regulations, and government actions that affect human rights, immigration, and national security. Beyond representing individual clients, we analyze policies, publish thought leadership, and contribute to public debates that shape the future of law.
2. How is policy advocacy different from your litigation and casework?
Litigation defends or advances the rights of specific clients in court. Policy advocacy addresses the broader legal framework—exposing flaws in regulations, recommending reforms, or challenging unlawful rules through strategic commentary and legal arguments.
3. Why does a law firm get involved in policy issues?
Because what happens in Congress, federal agencies, and the courts directly affects our clients. By engaging in policy advocacy, we protect vulnerable communities and strengthen the rule of law.
4. What topics do you focus on?
Asylum and immigration law, due process, human rights, and national security—plus related issues where legal frameworks impact civil liberties and democratic resilience.
5. Who authors your policy analysis?
Our founder and managing partner, Nathan M. F. Charles, Esq., leads much of our analysis and publishes through The Rule of Law Brief on Substack.
6. How can I join the discussion or give feedback?
Use the Join the Conversation Disqus section on the page to comment, critique, and suggest ideas. We welcome healthy criticism and diverse viewpoints—please keep discussion focused on ideas, not people.
7. Do you moderate comments? What are the ground rules?
Yes. We moderate to preserve a constructive space: stay on topic; no hate speech; no doxxing or client details; and no ad hominem attacks—this forum challenges arguments and ideas, not people. Persistent violators may be blocked.
8. Where else can I follow your policy work?
You can find additional content via our Substack as well as Instagram, TikTok, BlueSky, Threads, and our podcast links (Spotify, Apple Podcasts, TuneIn, Castbox) listed on the page.
9. How do I contact the firm directly?
Contact details (email and phone) are provided at the bottom of the page, along with the office address in Baltimore, MD.