Effective Questioning in Client Interviews

Date of Information: 09/20/2025

Check back soon; we update these materials frequently

Purpose & Scope

This page adapts structured questioning methods that our managing partner, Nathan M. F. Charles, Esq., learned as a military interrogator to the asylum context. The aim is to help legal interviewers elicit accurate, detailed, and trauma-informed narratives while preserving dignity and minimizing harm. Methods are descriptive, not coercive; they prioritize rapport, clear communication, and transparent documentation.

At Charles International Law, we believe that effective advocacy comes from knowing your client’s circumstances, motivations, and goals intimately. How can you know those things?—ask!

Core Principles

Client safety and dignity first. Build rapport, avoid judgmental language, and respect cultural frames of reference. Reduce distractions, listen fully, and use pauses.

  1. Specifics beat summaries. Prioritize concrete details—times, locations, sequences, sensory cues—to strengthen recall and credibility.

  2. Calibrate, don’t assume. Baseline the person’s normal communication style before drawing inferences from nonverbal cues; context drives meaning.

  3. Plan the interview. Clarify objectives, topics, and follow-ups in advance; prepare interpreters and materials (maps, forms) accordingly.

The Questioning Toolkit

The Basic Interrogatives (5W1H)

Use the simplest structure possible to map facts: Who, What, When, Where, Why, How. This anchors the interview to verifiable specifics and naturally surfaces leads.

Timeline Model

Reconstruct the person’s actions forward or backward in time, anchoring to a major event. Walk step-by-step: “What were you doing just before X? What happened next?” Ask for clock time or time-of-day anchors (e.g., before/after prayers, after sunset), travel durations, and transitions. This keeps you from “missing any time.”

Prompts you can use:

  • “Let’s start at the moment just before [key event]. What were you doing?”

  • “About what time was that? What tells you it was around then?”

  • “What happened immediately after? And then?”

The Basic Follow-Up Set

When a useful fact appears, expand it with short, repeatable prompts:

  • What else? Who else? Where else? When exactly? How? Why? Then what happened next?
    This standardized follow-up loop turns each lead into concrete information.

Areas of Questioning (People, Places, Things, Events)

Organize details by domain to prevent gaps:

  • People: identities, roles, relationships, descriptions.

  • Places: addresses, landmarks, directions, map positions.

  • Things: items, tools, documents, phones, vehicles.

  • Events: sequence, participants, cause, outcome.

Note-Taking That Drives Precision

Keep running notes that separate facts from impressions. Capture synopsis → paraphrase → direct quotes, mark uncertainties for later verification, and track all leads for follow-up. Don’t rely on memory.

Do(s) and Don’t(s) of Asking Questions

The idea of asking a question might seem simple, but there is a technique to it. Asking questions the wrong way might not just leave you ill-informed—it could lead you to make false assumptions.

Do:

  • Ask open-ended questions: “Tell me about…”, “Walk me through…”, “How did you get from A to B?”

  • Ask specific but neutral: “About what time?” “Which street?” “How far?”

  • Ask for details that help you corroborate critical facts: “What tells you it was Tuesday?” “How do you know the door faced east?”

Don’t:

  • Ask Yes/No (closed) questions as primary tools. At a minimum, you run the risk of getting an incomplete story. You might ask them to confirm a detail that happens to be true but which misses a more significant detail about which you didn’t ask. You also run the risk that your client will just say “yes” because he or she thinks that is what you or the court wants to hear. At worst, you might be aiding your client in a deception that might come back to bite the client later. Ask open questions to get the whole story—even the bad facts—so you can better counsel your cleint and protect his or her interests.

  • Use negative framing: “Didn’t you…?”—invites confusion. Wherever possible, ask confirming questions in the affirmative to eliminate confusion.

  • Ask vague questions: “Anything else?” (instead, specify the domain). Vague questions can be helpful once you have thoroughly explored a topic. Use them to ensure you don't miss anything that your client might consider important. However, save them for the end of the conversation.

  • Ask compound questions that mix issues. Ask one question at a time to avoid confusion.

Using Maps and Timelines With Clients

Maps and timelines help anchor memory and reduce ambiguity. When appropriate and client-safe:

  1. Start with a known point (home, landmark),

  2. Trace routes and durations,

  3. Mark key events with arrows or numbers,

  4. Capture directional cues (left/right, uphill/downhill), and

  5. Add labels you can later verify.

Interpreters: Quick Guidance

  • Brief your interpreter first whenever possible. Share your objectives, topics, and the 5W1H structure. Agree on a first-person, consecutive interpretation—ensure the interpreter repeats what you and the client say as if it were coming from their own mouths. Do not accept “gist” interpretations unless nothing better is available. The details that are lost in gist interpretations might be legally important. Due to no fault of their own, the interpreter might not recognize the significance of those details. Get a first-person, word-for-word interpretation wherever possible.

  • Pace & turn-taking. Ask one question at a time; avoid long monologues. Interpreters have a difficult job. You will only make it harder if you make them memorize paragraphs of speech on the fly.

  • Quality control. Listen for compression/summary; if you suspect it, ask for clarification and remind the interpreter to give a word-for-word interpretation.

Nonverbal Cues & Deception: Cautions

  • Nonverbal changes (pauses, self-adaptors, incongruent facial affect vs. words) can flag stress or cognitive load, not necessarily deception. Use them to form questions, not conclusions. Establish a conversational baseline during neutral topics first.

  • “Eye-movement” prompts (e.g., recalling visual vs. auditory details) can be helpful. However, they are best treated as memory-access exercises; always calibrate to the individual rather than applying rigid rules.

  • Always remember that body language varies significantly between individuals and cultures. Interpreting it is an art form at best, not an exact science.

Suggested Interview Workflow

  1. Preparation

    Define objectives and essential topics; line up maps, timelines, and forms; plan follow-ups and breaks.

  2. Rapport & Framing

    Explain purpose, confidentiality limits, and what will happen. Invite the client to correct you anytime. Use plain, culturally sensitive language.

  3. Free Narrative → Structured Detail

    Invite an uninterrupted account. Then apply 5W1H + Timeline Model, expanding with the Basic Follow-Up Set.

  4. Clarify & Verify

    Loop back through People / Places / Things / Events; add map markings; confirm dates/durations with concrete anchors.

  5. Sensitive Topics

    Signal choice and control; chunk questions; allow breaks. Avoid suggestive wording; let the client’s language lead. Inquires into torture can be particularly difficult for everyone involved. (CIL will publish specialized guidance on that topic soon.)

  6. Close & Next Steps

    Summarize what you captured, read back key points for confirmation, and list any documents or corroboration to collect next.

Quick Prompts & Scripts

  • Free narrative invite: “Start wherever makes sense to you. I’ll listen first, then I’ll ask to fill in details.”

  • Timeline anchor: “Let’s walk through the afternoon before the arrest—what’s the first thing you remember doing?”

  • Follow-ups (cycle): “What else? Who else? When exactly? How do you know? Then what happened next?”

  • Map aid: “From your front door to the checkpoint, which turns did you take? Can we sketch it together?”

  • Interpreter check: “Please interpret everything said in the first person and let me know if anything is unclear or untranslatable.”

  • If you are interviewing an asylum seeker, consider using CIL’s Questioning Models for Asylum Cases.

Common Pitfalls (and Fixes)

  • Pitfall: Jumping to conclusions from body language.
    Fix: Treat nonverbal shifts as cues for more questions, not proof. Baseline first.

  • Pitfall: Vague or compound questions.
    Fix: Split and specify; return to 5W1H and the Basic Follow-Up Set.

  • Pitfall: Memory gaps around time.
    Fix: Use routine anchors (meals, prayers, sunset), travel time, and map tracing.

  • Pitfall: Losing track of leads.
    Fix: Maintain a visible lead list in your notes; mark each with a planned follow-up.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What’s the goal of these questioning models in an asylum interview?
    To help the interviewer collect accurate, relevant facts while minimizing retraumatization—by structuring questions, listening actively, and following up methodically so important details aren’t missed.

  2. How do I decide when to move from open to specific questions?
    Start broad to let the client narrate; then narrow with targeted follow-ups once a clear topic emerges (people, places, things, events). This “funnel” preserves voice and improves precision.

  3. What is the Timeline Model and why is it useful here?
    It reconstructs events hour-by-hour (or step-by-step) using natural anchors (e.g., sunrise/sunset, prayer times, meals) and then verifies the sequence with short, concrete follow-ups. This reduces memory gaps and contradictions without leading the witness.

  4. What do “5W+H with Follow-Ups” look like in practice?
    Ask who/what/when/where/why/how, then immediately add a neutral follow-up such as “What happened next?” or “Who else was there?” to expand and complete the answer before changing topics.

  5. Which question types should I avoid?
    Leading, negative, vague, and compound questions (e.g., “So the guard threatened you and you ran?”) because they invite error or acquiescence. Use one topic per question and neutral wording.

  6. How should I prepare before the interview?
    Define your information needs, outline topical areas, and pre-draft neutral, single-purpose questions. Good prep clarifies what to ask—and just as importantly—what not to ask.

  7. Any guidance on note-taking?
    Capture the client’s wording, keep events in sequence, separate observations from the client’s statements, and use quick visual structures (e.g., mind-maps or flow lines) to track leads without interrupting.

  8. How can I improve listening and rapport without losing accuracy?
    Pursue one topic to completion, don’t interrupt the client’s account, and reflect back uncertainties to clarify meaning. Active listening paired with neutral follow-ups strengthens both rapport and reliability.

  9. Can I use nonverbal cues and eye movements to assess credibility?
    Use nonverbals only after you calibrate to the person—there are no universal “tells.” Watch for changes from the individual’s baseline rather than relying on stock cues or simplistic eye-movement rules.

  10. What if the client struggles to recall details?
    Help them tap into memory with specific sensory/context prompts (location, time-of-day, sequences, who else was present) and return to the timeline to anchor recall without suggesting content.

  11. How do I avoid accidental suggestion or contamination?
    Use the client’s words, ask short neutral questions about one fact at a time, and document uncertainties. When checking consistency, compare the client’s own prior statements, not your paraphrases.

  12. What’s a good way to close the interview?
    End with a structured recap (“Here’s what I heard about X, Y, Z—what did I miss?”), ask for corrections, and note any follow-up topics for a subsequent session rather than rushing through them.

Charles International Law’s research guides are always free, but if you find them helpful, please consider a donation or gratuity.